Timwi wrote:
I cannot follow this line of reasoning. The purpose of "being caseful", as you call it, is to have (1) correct article titles, and (2) the potential capability of having separate entries differing only in their capitalisation.
Indeed.
My worry -- which I may not have thought through far enough -- was that if there was *too* much mapping from the case variant that didn't exist to the case variant that did, it would be impossible to create that second entry differing only in its capitalization.