Au contraire: I think WMF has a responsibility to ensure the safety and
security of its editors, who might be working on topics controversial in
their home regions.
--scott
On Jul 29, 2013 9:36 PM, "Tyler Romeo" <tylerromeo(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Yeah, I think MediaWiki has much more important
security issues to worry
about than their TLS configurations. :P
*-- *
*Tyler Romeo*
Stevens Institute of Technology, Class of 2016
Major in Computer Science
www.whizkidztech.com | tylerromeo(a)gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Chad <innocentkiller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Thomas Gries
<mail(a)tgries.de> wrote:
> Am 29.07.2013 21:31, schrieb Ryan Lane:
> >
> >> That ssllabs link also shows that wikimedia has RC4 encryption
enabled
> >> on SSL connections, which offers no
real security. This is
apparently
> related to the TLS 1.0 -vs- TLS 1.1/1.2 issue:
>
>
https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2013/03/19/rc4-in-tls-is-br…
We do better than the check site itself ;-)
https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/analyze.html?d=ssllabs.com
-Chad
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l