On Monday 02 June 2003 01:19, Erik Moeller wrote:
I didn't choose the FDL, and I wouldn't. If it wasn't so hard to change licenses, we might have already switched to Creative Commons style copyleft or something similar. I am increasingly coming to the conclusion that the FDL is unsuitable for online publications. Even the Debian project rejects it. For my own textual projects, I use the public domain. The GNU project should stick to software licenses.
Just to avoid a misunderstanding: the Debian project rejects the GFDL mainly because of the "invariant section" (as far as I understood it). So GFDL is, according to them, "not free enough". FWIW,
Marco