Ideally we could use something like orcid (used that a lot in my past at CERN to identify
authors/institutions):
https://orcid.org/
But yep, some standardization would be good (specially for adoption, though for starters
we might be able to do without,
same as author and such).
On 06/01 11:28, AntiCompositeNumber wrote:
For this to work well, I think it would be useful to
document
somewhere how sponsoring organizations should be identified. Things
like "WMF" vs "Wikimedia Foundation", and should departments/teams
also be identified? If departments/teams are going to be included,
should they be free-form ("Wikimedia Foundation Release Engineering")
or more structured ("wmf-releng" or "wmf/tech/releng")?
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:14 AM Lars Wirzenius <lwirzenius(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 08:04:23PM +0200, David Caro wrote:
I'm willing to help with some scripts/hooks
to set it up if needed
(though I'm suspicious they already exist xd).
I added a line to my git commit template, and it suffices for me so
far. I'm sure this can be made smoother.
--
WMF release engineering team | he/him or they/them
"Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in
the sum of all knowledge."
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list -- wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikitech-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list -- wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikitech-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikitech-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
--
David Caro
SRE - Cloud Services
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
PGP Signature: 7180 83A2 AC8B 314F B4CE 1171 4071 C7E1 D262 69C3
"Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. That's our commitment."