On 3 December 2014 at 17:03, Giuseppe Lavagetto
<glavagetto(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
it's been quite a journey since we started working
on HHVM, and last
week (November 25th) HHVM was finally introduced to all users who didn't
opt-in to the beta feature.
Excellent! Excellent! Does that make us the second-largest HHVM site?
What sort of bugs needed squashing? (Is there a list, or a suitable
Phabricator query?)
This new PHP runtime has already halved our backend
latency and page
save times, and it has also reduced significantly the load on our
cluster (as I write this email, the average cpu load on the application
servers is around 16%, while it was easily above 50% in the pre-HHVM era).
How is the 1.23 tarball under HHVM? Would backports of fixes be
accepted for the LTS?
- d.