On Wed, 2016-06-01 at 04:23 +0200, Danny B. wrote:
If tasks were properly triaged and tagged, it would be
easy to create
various quite accurate statistics.
If you think that tasks aren't "properly triaged" currently, could you
elaborate what specifically you'd like to see changed?
But attempts to create tags which would allow it were
and are
unfortunatelly being questioned, delayed, stalled or even declined.
Do you have specific examples? I do ask for usecases on proposed tags
when I don't see how they'd support those folks managing and fixing
tasks, as I'd like to avoid categorizing for the sake of categorizing
(+people need to do the categorizing, which triggers notifications).
In one of my previous jobs, where I was taking care of
the bugtracker as a
part of my duty, after I made an order in it, the number of opened tasks
decreased to nearly 70% of the original count.
Was that a public bugtracker where anyone could file tasks and anyone
could work on tasks (FOSS project?), or an internal instance?
Cheers,
andre
Then after some statistics I'
ve ran from the new data, our teams became more effective and productive due
to having better data to work with and at the end of the consolidation
process, we ended up in oscilating between 30-50% of the original amount of
opened tasks.
I wish it was possible to achieve the same here...
--
Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler
http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/