On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, rupert THURNER <rupert.thurner(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
quim, i would not be angry if you would show a little
bit more empathy
towards a client, a volunteer. if mzmcbride is right and there is a
well established procedure to change this page which was not followed,
the person not following might read the "expected behaviour" page.
putting the blame on the person harrassed/frustrated (mzmcbride), not
on the harrasser (whoever changed the page) seems not a nice move in
that case.
I don't think it's accurate or helpful to describe technical changes made
in good faith as "harassment" (regardless of the merits of the change).