On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, rupert THURNER rupert.thurner@gmail.com wrote:
quim, i would not be angry if you would show a little bit more empathy towards a client, a volunteer. if mzmcbride is right and there is a well established procedure to change this page which was not followed, the person not following might read the "expected behaviour" page. putting the blame on the person harrassed/frustrated (mzmcbride), not on the harrasser (whoever changed the page) seems not a nice move in that case.
I don't think it's accurate or helpful to describe technical changes made in good faith as "harassment" (regardless of the merits of the change).