Steve Bennett wrote:
On 6/16/06, Erik Moeller eloquence@gmail.com wrote:
I think they're important lest we be confused with a gardening store. The allusion to the wiki syntax has always worked for me, and I've seen quite a few wikis create derivative works with something else between the brackets. (This is one reason why I insist that the logo should be free content.)
Are they they only way this can be done? Is [[image]] the only arrangement incorporating MediaWiki syntax with an image?
How about:
{{sofixit}}
No wait, that's the Wikipedia logo... ;)
I know I'm sounding negative here, but I'm not particularly taken with the new flower - always sort of liked the old one, asymmetry and all. :) Would like to hear what others think.
The old flower has a real, organic look to it which I like, though it could do with more contrast. The new one looks very fake, despite being real. :)
-- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)