On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:03:45AM +0200, Steve Bennett wrote:
On 5/22/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
We want them to have WYSIWYM (What you see is what you mean). We generally do not want editors fussing with appearance too much while working on content, at least so long as we want people to stay productive (rather than spending hours futzing with getting the most attractive customized fonts for every heading) and so long as we want the look and feel to be even remotely consistent.
I don't think anyone has proposed allowing customised fonts for each heading. By WYSIWYG, I simple mean "You see bold when you want bold - you don't see ''' ". What distinction are getting at with "WYSIWYM"?
Don't we already get that with the preview?