Ray Saintonge wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
Ray Saintonge wrote:
Magnus Manske wrote:
Neil Harris wrote:
Am I being naive here, or would a super-dumb implementation with a single table with the columns shown below be enough to work in the short term?
Page_ID Revision_ID User_ID Rating_ID Rating value Timestamp
This is what I did; no timestamp, but a varchar for comments. Topics to rate and their range (e.g, 1-5) are encoded here as well for user #0. That's about as dumb as it gets ;-)
I still prefer a 0-10 range of ratings. I think a decimal normalization would be easier to work with in any subsequent analysis of results.
One can set the range for each topic individually.
BTW, with values 0-10, you'd have eleven values...
Yes. That's a problem??
Not at all. I was just wondering, eleven values vs. "decimal normalization" (which seems to be based on ten). But, what do I know about statistics?
Anyway, the range will not be determined by the software. Bureaucrats can set a range of their choice when they create a topic.
Magnus