On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Jon Davis <wiki(a)konsoletek.com> wrote:
As for being an OpenID provider... only one major
thought: Having this
Foundation be a provider would be a lot of additional server load (It is
100% non-cacheable) without any benefit to the main goal of providing free
I imagine the load wouldn't be a big deal. An OpenID server is pretty
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Ryan Lane <rlane32(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The biggest immediate benefit to becoming a provider
non-MediaWiki based apps that the foundation uses. If we become a
provider, our Wordpress, Bugzilla, Ideatorrent, etc. apps don't need
to have separate username/password databases.
Assuming all of these actually support OpenID as consumers, without
annoying limitations. Do they?