Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
Well, for what my opinion is worth (I'm not a Wikimedia admin, but I've been on the net for about 23 years) the writer doesn't sound like a) an idiot, or b) a kook. He may be slightly uninformed technically (though I'm not sure I even think that), but...
Let me make sure I'm following your perception: he says the HTTP proxy which is blocked a) isn't his, b) isn't easily avoidable c) causes collateral damage and d) is "safe", and you believe one or more of those assertions to be factually inaccurate?
a) I am assuming that mr. wwwwolf is in fact a legitimate user of the ISP that he describes. b) I am assuming this is his only ISP, i.e., he doesn't have access to an alternate ISP for purposes of editing wikipedia. c) I have, at this time, no reason to believe he's a vandal, therefore I assume denial of service to him would be considered collateral damage, yes. d) I know for a fact that anybody in the world can configure his or her web browser to use his IP address (213.216.199.14, just as I did to in the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox]] to find out [1] what the IP was, and [2] whether or not it had already been blocked) without any authentication or accountability whatsoever, so I would not consider it "safe" by any means.
I count 3 out of 4 to be inaccurate.
--freakofnurture -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tor-and-%22X-Forwarded-For%22-t1325932.html#a3545275 Sent from the Wikipedia Developers forum at Nabble.com.