the reason to use two fields instead of one makes it much easier to implement or performant?
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 1:08 AM, David Schoonover dsc@wikimedia.org wrote:
Huh! News to me as well. I definitely agree with that decision. Thanks, Ori!
I've already written the Varnish code for setting X-MF-Mode so it can be captured by varnishncsa. Is there agreement to switch to Mobile-Mode, or at least, MF-Mode?
Looking especially to hear from Arthur and Matt.
-- David Schoonover dsc@wikimedia.org
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Diederik van Liere dvanliere@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Thanks Ori, I was not aware of this D
Sent from my iPhone
On 2013-02-02, at 16:55, Ori Livneh ori@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Saturday, February 2, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Platonides wrote:
I don't like it's cryptic nature.
Someone looking at the headers sent to his browser would be very confused about what's the point of «X-MF-Mode: b».
Instead something like this would be much more descriptive: X-Mobile-Mode: stable X-Mobile-Request: secondary
But that also means sending more bytes through the wire :S
Well, you can (and should) drop the 'X-' :-)
See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6648: Deprecating the "X-" Prefix and
Similar Constructs in Application Protocols
-- Ori Livneh
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l