-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Moin,
On Thursday 14 September 2006 15:46, Ligulem wrote:
Brion Vibber wrote:
IIRC, the default is simply not to mess with the text, which is always the most sensible thing.
I see. Seems we have to stick then with the current level of messing with dates ;-)
Marking dates with <date> (or something) wouldn't be bad, IMHO.
Something like <date>2006-09-14</date> would be fine. Displayed as "14 September, 2006" on en "14. September 2006" on de with selectable overrides per logged-in user.
I agree that scanning wikitext for text that looks like dates might technically not be the best solution.
Also, having a date linked in order to get date display magic is against orthogonality of choices.
But if you mark them with date<2006-09-14> or the more wiki like {{date| d=2006-09-14}} (or your <date></date>, but wikitext was the reason why I stopped writing HTML in the first place), then they could be automatically linked, too :)
Best wishes,
Tels
- -- Signed on Thu Sep 14 16:36:23 2006 with key 0x93B84C15. Visit my photo gallery at http://bloodgate.com/photos/ PGP key on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or per email.
"My glasses, my glasses. I cannot see without my glasses." - "My glasses, my glasses. I cannot be seen without my glasses."