If you check MessagesEn.php you will find that Administrator(s) and Sysop(s)
are both used. In r45154 I (arbitrarily) changed the remaining [Ss]ysop(s)
to [Aa]dministrators. In hindsight most probably because "sysop" is either
archaic, or MediaWiki specific, while "administrator" is a more known term
for someone with administrative rights in a piece of software.
In r45249 brion reverted this change with the comment "Let's not go changing
core terminology around without making sure there's general agreement".
A few observations/opinions:
(a) general agreement is impossible (and agreement among whom? Developers,
users, those that read this mailing list, ...)
(b) consistent naming of a role is important to not confuse users of the
software
I think that it is clear that at least something should be harmonised if you
observe the messages below:
$ egrep "([Aa]dministrator|[Ss]ysop)" MessagesEn.php
* While logged in as a sysop user, go to [[Special:Allmessages]]
The administrator who locked it offered this explanation: $1',
Please report this to an [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|administrator]], making
note of the URL.',
You can contact $1 or another
[[{{MediaWiki:Grouppage-sysop}}|administrator]] to discuss the block.
You may contact $1 or one of the other
[[{{MediaWiki:Grouppage-sysop}}|administrators]] to discuss the block.
The administrator who locked it offered this explanation: $1',
'protectedpagewarning' => '<strong>WARNING: This page has
been
locked so that only users with sysop privileges can edit it.</strong>',
'cascadeprotectedwarning' =>
"'''Warning:''' This page has been
locked so that only users with sysop privileges can edit it, because it is
included in the following cascade-protected {{PLURAL:$1|page|pages}}:",
As an administrator on {{SITENAME}} you can view it;
'revdelete-hide-restricted' => 'Apply these restrictions to Sysops and
lock this interface',
'revdelete-suppress' => 'Suppress data from Sysops as well as
others',
'revdelete-restricted' => 'applied restrictions to sysops',
'revdelete-unrestricted' => 'removed restrictions for sysops',
'suppressionlogtext' => 'Below is a list of deletions and blocks involving
content hidden from sysops.
'userrights-nologin' => 'You must [[Special:UserLogin|log in]]
with an administrator account to assign user rights.',
'group-sysop' => 'Sysops',
'group-sysop-member' => 'Sysop',
'grouppage-sysop' => '{{ns:project}}:Administrators',
'right-suppressrevision' => 'Review and restore revisions hidden from
Sysops',
Please contact an [[Special:ListUsers/sysop|administrator]].',
If the problem persists, contact an
[[Special:ListUsers/sysop|administrator]].',
'protect-level-sysop' => 'Sysops only',
'restriction-level-sysop' => 'full protected',
The actual text of these deleted revisions is only available to
administrators.',
'range_block_disabled' => 'The sysop ability to create range
blocks is disabled.',
Cheers! Siebrand
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: wikitech-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wikitech-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] Namens MZMcBride
Verzonden: woensdag 31 december 2008 22:20
Aan: wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Onderwerp: [Wikitech-l] Deprecate 'sysop' throughout MediaWiki?
There's been a bit of recent discussion about deprecating the term 'sysop'
throughout MediaWiki by replacing it with 'admin' or 'administrator'.
The primary advantage here would be that 'admin' or 'administrator' is
more
clear and better defines the role that these users play within a wiki. See
also related bug:
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16737
There are a number of different places that 'sysop' is used throughout the
software, and it may or may not be advantageous to change all of them (for
example inside the user_groups table). On the other hand, however, changing
only some of the software while not changing other parts may simply lead to
more confusion.
Thoughts on the idea in general? Thoughts on the details?
MZMcBride
public(a)mzmcbride.com