Okay then, so what query do you use to get a history of +1 and -1 reviews a user has made?
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Daniel Friesen daniel@nadir-seen-fire.comwrote:
On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 16:37:47 -0800, Ori Livneh ori@wikimedia.org wrote:
Hi,
Just a heads-up that I nominated Krenair (Alex Monk) for inclusion in mediawiki/core: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/**Git/Gerrit_project_ownership#** Krenair_for_MediaWiki_Corehttp://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Git/Gerrit_project_ownership#Krenair_for_MediaWiki_Core
For supporting evidence, see:
mediawiki/core,n,zhttps://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/q/owner:krenair+project:mediawiki/core,n,z
specific&product=MediaWiki&**content=krenair%40gmail.comhttps://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=specific&product=MediaWiki&content=krenair%40gmail.com
- http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/**Special:Contributions/Krenairhttp://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Krenair
Please consider weighing in. Thanks, Ori
-- Ori Livneh
Why is a list of commits considered valid evidence for determining if someone is worth giving +2?
One does not review their own commits. The commits made by the user themselves are irrelevant as it would be irresponsible for the +2 to be given in order for said line of commits to be reviewed. The +2 is for use in reviewing other users' commits.
More to the point, better evidence would be a history of -1 and +1 the user has made. Are the user's +1's in line with whether a +2 was eventually made (not retaining +1 on something that was decided should be rejected)? Does the user make +1 and -1's to aid review of commits that don't get much review from others till after the user has already been helping review the commits for awhile? etc...
-- ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://danielfriesen.name/]
______________________________**_________________ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikitech-lhttps://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l