Hey,
About the semantic extensions:
It would actually be nice if they did not get marked deferred at all, and be reviewed by people that are familiar with them to some extend. I'm willing to do that for all commits not made by myself. Assuming this would not interfere to much with WMF code review of course :)
Cheers
-- Jeroen De Dauw * http://blog.bn2vs.com * http://wiki.bn2vs.com Don't panic. Don't be evil. 50 72 6F 67 72 61 6D 6D 69 6E 67 20 34 20 6C 69 66 65! --
On 20 July 2010 15:10, Chad innocentkiller@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Daniel Kinzler daniel@brightbyte.de wrote:
Roan Kattouw schrieb:
Despite these limitations, this feature could be quite useful for autodeferring at least some large parts of the repository we don't care about review-wise. Any suggestions for paths to auto-defer?
http://svn.wikimedia.org/svnroot/mediawiki/trunk/WikiWord/ is basically
my
personal pet project. If you can keep it out of the review queue, that
would
probably be an improvement for everyone :)
-- daniel
I was going to suggest that. And might I be so bold as to suggest the Semantic* extensions. They're generally marked as deferred without review.
I also want to make a quick disclaimer. This doesn't mean that these code paths don't matter. It just means they aren't actively reviewed on CR, so we want to just automate what reviewers are doing manually anyway
-Chad
Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l