On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
However, you do seem to be requiring a nonexistent
perfect proposal
over one that would bring the present software to mere adequacy.
You may have missed the part where I said "You've convinced me that
your approach is pretty reasonable given the circumstances, although I
wish it didn't have to intrude into unrelated extensions."
Understandable, it was a long post and I should have emphasized the
conclusion more. (It didn't help that I changed my mind on the issue
twice while writing the post. Tends to obscure your point when that
happens.)