On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Merlijn van Deen <valhallasw(a)arctus.nl> wrote:
On 29 November 2011 19:45, Diederik van Liere
The question is, when is LATER? Technically,
these bugs are not open and so
nobody will ever see them again and that's how they will be forgotten.
I would interpret 'LATER' as 'this bug should be re-evaluated after a
certain period of time'.
Following this train of thought, a LATER bug should have a re-evaluation
date planned, after which it is changed back to NEW. This probably is not
possible, but I think it makes sense to change LATER bugs to NEW after,
say, a year or so.
Reviewed perhaps, but not necessarily marked back to NEW unless we
actually plan to take action on it.