Yes, that sounds reasonable :-)
Purodha
On 02.06.2016 19:24, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
OK, so it sounds like the best way forward is:
1. For any wikis that have specific language versions of uca collation
available (for example, uca-fr), but haven't yet switched to it, go
ahead
and switch them to that collation. This should take care of a few dozen
wikis.
2. Start a discussion on Meta wiki about potentially changing the
default
collation from uppercase to uca-default and (hopefully) find out if
this
would cause any problems or if there are wikis that would want to opt
out
(or if it's just a bad idea in general).
Does that sound reasonable to everyone?
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Brian Wolff <bawolff(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Friday, May 27, 2016, John Mark Vandenberg
<jayvdb(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Yes, of course, & a meta discussion will
likely unearth many reasons to
opt-out ;)
Does uca (or extension) do the right thing for West Frisian (fy) wrt y &
i ?
Or, ... it would be helpful to put the list of 94 wiki somewhere easy to
consume.
Fy is not on the list at
https://ssl.icu-project.org/trac/browser/icu/trunk/source/data/coll?order=n…
. As a general rule any language not on that list that does something
that
either conflicts with english, or has something complicated (such as
having
letters with diacretics being considered a full letter to be sorted
seperately (in the terminology of UCA having a primary weight
difference) )
will probably not work fully correctly with the uca collation. Of
course
uca-default still might be a better fallback then the current system
depending on the language.
--
bawolff
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l