Daniel Herding <DHerding(a)gmx.de> writes:
> Anscheinend ein Softwarefehler; {{CURRENTDAY}} und {{CURRENTMONTH}} werden
> beim Speichern gelöscht. Ich habe das Datum erstmal fest eingetragen, bis das
> geklärt ist. Die Hauptseite muss solange täglich von einem Admin umgestellt
> werden.
>
> Was noch kaputt ist, sind die Überschriften z.B. bei 'Fehlende Artikel'.
kaputt ist auch die art, wie jetzt bilder eingebunden werden; das
elegante grau mußte nun einem neon-blauen rahmen weichen und die
bildunterschriften haben keinen hintergrund mehr. und der text fließt
nicht mehr um die bilder 'rum.
ich bin jedes mal wieder sehr erfreut, wenn uns die entwickler mit
einem solchen update mal eben beglücken. eine ankündigung auf der
mailingliste ist selbst verständlich auch nicht notwendig.
keep on playing - I take a break.
--
| ,__o
| _-\_<,
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | (*)/'(*)
Made changes on
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Especial:Recentchanges
and get the following error message
Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object
in
/usr/local/apache/common-local/php-new/includes/Skin.php
on line 1911
JorgeGG
=====
____________________________________________
Jorge Gallardo Gastelo
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias.
Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com
Good news, techsters!
The 2U server has been delivered, yesterday afternoon, 1 day earlier
than my most recent estimate. (Specifications at the bottom of this
post, after all the blah-blah-blah.)
This means that I can run memtest86 (opteron version) overnight
tonight, and hand it over to the developers tomorrow.
Here is my schedule for today -
1. At 9AM I have an interview with Voice of America. That should take
only 10-15 minutes.
2. After that I will be going to my office downtown to pick up
various this and that (raid card for 1U server, Fedora Core 1 and 2
ISOs etc.) and heading to the colocation facility.
3. When I get to the colocation facility, I will do whatever I need
to do to get 3 of the 4 1U servers online immediately -- the Wikipedia
seems half dead to me this morning, I have a feeling the Yahoo feed
has launched and we're getting slaughtered. Hopefully those machines
can be pressed into service almost immediately to help relieve things.
4. For the "new zwinger", I will need to do whatever I need to do to
get the 2x250gb RAID array with fedora core installed. I think this
is going to be easy, as I already have 2 hard drives in a mirror with
Fedora core all ready -- but I made these in an old machine of mine,
and nothing ever works as planned with computers. :-) But once I get
that going, I'll hand that one over as well.
5. The people at Silicon Mechanics gave me a full explanation of
this, and after we discussed it, they went ahead and shipped the new
server with *32 bit* Fedora Core 1. That's because *64* bit Fedora
Core 1 would not install. But Fedora Core 2 (64 bit) *would* install,
and they would have been happy to do it for me, but because they have
a slow isdn line, and didn't have the ISOs yet, it was going to take
them longer than it would take me, so I had them just ship it.
So this means that I will be installing Fedora Core 2 64bit.
Additionally, they set up the RAID 10 like this:
219GB HW RAID 10 (split over 2 Channels)
But James Day has convinced me that this isn't exactly what we want.
I'm going to review our discussions of that, as well as discussions on
the list, and then I'll also show up in IRC to make a final
confirmation of what we want to do.
-------
Here are the specs...
Dual AMD Opteron 248 - 2.2Ghz - 1MB L2 Cache
Memory: 8GB (8x1GB) PC2700 Registered ECC
HDD (6): Seagate Cheetah 15K.3 73GB U320 15KRPM SCA SCSI
SCSI Controller: LSI MegaRaid SCSI 320-2 - 2 Channel U320 RAID 64MB Cache w/BBU
CD-ROM
Floppy
460W hotswap redundant power supplies (to be place on two different
circuits!)
--Jimbo
On fy: I noticed that there seems to have occurred an error in the
conversion to MediaWiki 1.3. Where HTML UTF is used (like Ӓ),
the ; at the end is removed. See
http://fy.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Haadside&oldid=6849 -
I checked on Google that previously this was correct.
Andre Engels
So, there were some questions about using the real names functionality
added for Wikimedia 1.3. They seem to have been rolled out for
Wiktionary and other projects without a lot of problem.
I know this sounds lazy, but do I need to take the time to set up a
boolean variable to hide this field on the login and preferences
pages? Or will we roll out with the field default-on, and not able to
be disabled by admins? (Users can always leave the field blank if they
wish, of course.)
~ESP
--
Evan Prodromou <evan(a)wikitravel.org>
Wikitravel - http://wikitravel.org/en/
The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide
"Timwi" <timwi(a)gmx.net> schrieb:
> Andre Engels wrote:
>
> > however my
> > reasoning has nothing to do with 'embarassment' but with the question
> > whether it's really a language used for communication.
>
> More so than Toki Pona.
That's why I would be for removal of Toki Pona, while agreeing with
keeping Klingon, just not wholeheartedly.
Andre Engels
"Tim Starling" <ts4294967296(a)hotmail.com> schrieb:
> Jimbo said he wanted it. As far as I'm concerned, developers are still
> answerable to him not the other way around. If you want to hold a site
> wide vote, go for your life. If there's enough support, we'll delete the
> wiki.
No, Jimbo did not see that, all he said was that "I have no objections
to it." That's quite a bit different from wanting it. Also, the
developers should not be answerable to Jimbo (nor the other way around).
They should be answerable to the community.
My personal opinion on Klingon is a hesitating 'for', where however my
reasoning has nothing to do with 'embarassment' but with the question
whether it's really a language used for communication. Regarding the
other languages, I am in favor of deleting Toki Pona, see no reason to
keep Serbocroatian, and would not object against deletion of Moldovan.
Andre Engels
Hi,
it seems that the Toki Pona inter-wiki links have stopped working again,
apparently both on en and on eo (and I don't know what else). Please
could someone fix this for good?
Thanks,
Timwi
"Tim Starling" <ts4294967296(a)hotmail.com> schrieb:
> Gutza wrote:
> > Aromanian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromanian) is a Romanian
> > language (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_language) dialect.
> >
> > A new Wikipedia is requested for this language on the Romanian Wikipedia
> > (http://ro.wikipedia.org) by Aromanians who don't know where else to
> > turn. Romanian wikipedians have "offered" temporary demo space for the
> > Aromanian Wikipedia main page at
> > http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Prota_padzin%C3%A2
> >
> > As far as rigid official ethnography language codes are concerned, all I
> > was able to find regarding Aromanian was ISO 639-2, along with a "SIL"
> > language code, as described in
> > http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=RUP
>
> After a discussion between Brion and I over standard compliance (he's
> such a stickler) and appropriate names, we eventually decided on:
>
> http://roa-rup.wikipedia.org
Will it also be available in interwikis using [[roa-rup:subject]]?
Andre Engels
Aromanian (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aromanian) is a Romanian
language (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_language) dialect.
A new Wikipedia is requested for this language on the Romanian Wikipedia
(http://ro.wikipedia.org) by Aromanians who don't know where else to
turn. Romanian wikipedians have "offered" temporary demo space for the
Aromanian Wikipedia main page at
http://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Prota_padzin%C3%A2
As far as rigid official ethnography language codes are concerned, all I
was able to find regarding Aromanian was ISO 639-2, along with a "SIL"
language code, as described in
http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=RUP
On the other hand, UTF-8 should be more than ok for this language as far
as technical concerns go.
Please let me know if there are any other concerns or problems regarding
the creation of this new Wikipedia, and I'll be glad to clarify them.
The ideal URL for the new Wikipedia would be http://ars.wikipedia.org,
but any alternate suggestions are welcome.
Also, if there are any problems with or concerns against creating this
Wikipedia, please do let me know so I can explain the respective issues
to (and clarify them with) the Aromanian users on the Romanian Wikipedia.
Thank you for your time,
[[w:user:Gutza]]