Aubreyand if this kind of games could help some users to do the hard and often boring job of fixing typos/proofreading/validating, I don't see why it'd be regarded as bad.Wikisources are historically understaffed :-),but I would say that we should test everything that can engage users and readers.I fully understand how many people could not like this kind of counting/gamification,I didn't know those, thanks!Well, no, I'm not scared.On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Ricordisamoa <ricordisamoa@openmailbox.org> wrote:Something like Achievements / Contribution Scores?
Aren't you afraid of (game|wikia)ification?
Il 01/02/2015 19:56, Andrea Zanni ha scritto:
Phe, Tpt, is it difficult to make?So, a simple "proofread counter" could be helpful in this regard.I would say it's a good way to engage readers, which is often difficult in Wikisource.I can imagine a sort of *gamification*, so that each Wikisource community decides some barnstars or title or awards per pages proofread, and or validated.but, *per user*.Hello everybody.It's a long time I'm wondering if it's possibile to count stats like this:
https://tools.wmflabs.org/phetools/statistics.php?diff=1
Thanks everybody
Aubrey
_______________________________________________ Wikisource-l mailing list Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l