> Is there a need for this
> ''empty discussion'' about empty pages
> here,
> The main point ist to find an for all acceptable
> way of working together with Thomas. In a way
> that Thomas is satisfied and feels comfortable, taking the
> problems he see's into concern and the problems some
> projects have.
> And it should be a compromise that all can accept,
> without feeling overruled by others.
> With this in the background the other discussion
> is simply silly. Some are talking about some pages, which
> in total are below 1%, there are bigger issues to
> solve.
>
>
> sincerly joergens.mi
>
>
>
>
>
> 2009/10/14 Birgitte SB <
birgitte_sb@yahoo.com>
>
> I
> disagree in general with the idea that everyone must
> conform. There is room for the communities to develop
> their own solutions. Hopefully when one community proves
> that some solution has good results others will learn from
> their experience and adopt it. But there needs to be room
> for experimentation.
>
>
>
>
> In this specific case, it seems to me this is more of
> legacy issue on de.WS rather than a deliberate choice. If
> they (as well as every other subdomains) conform to the
> standards the majority of Wikisources use then the
> comparative numbers between Wikisources will be more
> accurate. I don't see a strong reason for de.WS
> deciding to not conform here. But it is a bunch of tedious
> work and it should be thoroughly discussed. It would be
> very nice if de.WS took the time to consider the issue and
> let us know what the consensus turns out to be.
>
>
>
>
> However we can always make a footnote when people choose to
> count things differently and estimate with data crunching.
> (i.e. Of 1000 validated pages on the top three non-de.WS
> subdomains the average number of empty pages is X (A%),
> therefore an estimate of de.WS validated non-empty page is
> the given total minus the A% of the given total) This is
> not an unsolvable issue and I am sure sooner of later some
> subdomain will discover a good reason to do something
> differently.
>
>
>
>
> Birgitte SB
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 10/14/09, Syagrius <
syagrius@gmx.fr>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > From: Syagrius <
syagrius@gmx.fr>
>
> > Subject: Re: [Wikisource-l] Pages without text
>
> > To: "discussion list for Wikisource, the free
> library" <
wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
>
> > Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2009, 10:47 AM
>
> > #yiv579852079 html, #yiv579852079
>
> > {}#yiv579852079 html
>
> >
> {width:100%;height:100%;margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv579852079
>
> > {font-size:100.01%;font-family:Verdana, Geneva,
> Arial,
>
> > Helvetica,
>
> >
> sans-serif;background-color:transparent;background-image:none;margin:0px;padding:5px;}#yiv579852079
>
> > p {margin:0px;padding:0px;}#yiv579852079
>
> > {font-size:12px;font-family:Verdana, Geneva, Arial,
>
> > Helvetica,
>
> > sans-serif;background-color:#FFFFFF;}#yiv579852079 p
>
> > {margin:0;padding:0;}#yiv579852079 blockquote
>
> >
> {padding-left:5px;margin-left:5px;margin-bottom:0px;margin-top:0px;}#yiv579852079
>
> > blockquote.quote {border-left:1px solid
>
> > #CCC;padding-left:5px;margin-left:5px;} If the
> Wikisources have adopted
>
> > some common rules, every sublanguage
> should follow it. On
>
> > the other hand, I don't understand why you
> don't
>
> > want to transform these empty pages, since
en.ws
> and
fr.ws
>
> > already did it and a bot could do it very easily.
> There
>
> > would be absolutely no loss of quality or
> credibility...
>
> >
>
> > Syagrius
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ----- Message
>
> > d'origine -----De : John
>
> > VandenbergEnvoyés : 14.10.09 02:03À :
>
> > discussion list for Wikisource, the free
>
> > libraryObjet : Re: [Wikisource-l] Pages without
>
> > text On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:12
> AM, Cecil
>
> > wrote:
>
> > > Syagrius, could you please explain why this would
> be
>
> > "irrespectuous toward
>
> > > other wikisources" when we mark them as part
> of a
>
> > 'finished' project?
>
> >
>
> > It is not a part of the same work.
>
> >
>
> > Advertisements are a _different_ work, and it has not
> been
>
> > transcribed.
>
> >
>
> > It should be marked as a incomplete.
>
> >
>
> > Advertisements are also sources....
>
> >
>
> >
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Category:Advertisements
>
> >
>
> > :-)
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > John Vandenberg
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > Wikisource-l mailing list
>
> >
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > Wikisource-l mailing list
>
> >
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>
> >
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Wikisource-l mailing list
>
>
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikisource-l mailing list
>
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l