(Not that this is not self-evident)

First steps have to be
* Get the digital copies
* Upload to commons and get all the copyright stuff done (so we can keep
the deletion maggots away)
* Get the index pages created, with pagelists

After that it would seem that there needs to be gamification, and what is
the 'reward'.

Our Indian colleagues have given us some great examples of what has been
done, and some of the benefits that have come from it.  So what follows is
some random thoughts just to put out there, and to be plus'd or minuse'd
by
the community as they see fit. This is just a stream of green hat thinking
...

As there is no OCR, we could look to a scoring system based on a
combination of ...
* characters added (filesize increase)
* starting a page
* advancing to proofread status
* advancing to validate status

We could look to
* individual scoring
* team scoring 

An issue for team scoring is that if we had this overt for schools,
classes, age groups, then we have a point of identification, and possibly
some problem for predatory behaviour on kids. So teams would need to have
a
level of self-ownership. Using the previous conversation in the thread
about education tool, there could be a value in team scoring availability
in that (through facebook) it takes the gamification outside of Wikisource,
in that teams can self-organise. We would just need to organise to enable
teams and a scoring system.

We could give 'awards' for individual scores, and acknowledge teams. That
said, what scope is there for getting some recognition from the releasing
agency of the works for any team achievement? 

Also to note that this is going to be a long term project, we want to have
lots of milestone awards. Recognition by month, and by year. Looking to
celebrate 1k 10k, 100k edit +++  As WMF is trying to push into these
markets, one would hope that we could look to getting a series of
microgrants/microawards that could be utilised for some recognition as a
final goal.

So we would need to find some vols in the broader space who can help us
build some tools, or maybe that is part of a thought in a grant
application. Any tool we would want to be generic so that all places can
look to utilise for any other gamification.

Anyway, just my thought bubbles.

Regards, Billinghurst