All this is way more complex than what we have at he.wikisource.
We only link the main ns0 page of a work, and usually we have only one
edition of it. We don't use the index NS much, (since most of our books are
either manually typed-in or OCRed privately and the text uploaded, either
before or after having been proofread. If not proofread, we add a template).
This is the way our veteran users have gotten used to run things. I guess
it drives would-be newcomers away. But we've been experimenting with a few
works done with the Index:/Page: interface and it seems even more confusing
to newcomers who don't know how to create a book from the proofread pages
and see an accomplished result for their efforts.
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Nicolas VIGNERON <
vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2016-05-21 11:50 GMT+02:00 Andrea Zanni <zanni.andrea84(a)gmail.com>om>:
Thanks Tpt for the quick response.
I feel that that is the situation for most Wikisources: the problem is
that it's a static model, and not a procedure.
Exactly what I tried to say : the problem is practical not theorical.
For example:
I put a new book in my Wikisource, what should I do?
* check if is a new edition of a book in WS
if not
* check if there is already an item on WD
** if so, check if is work or edition
** if edition --> ok, link it
** if work, create edition, then link it
Workflows like this, I think, are not in place.
We would need a WikidataWizard :-D
\o/ we definitely need that !
Who could build such a WonderfulWikidataWizard ?
Cdlt, ~nicolas
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l