+1
The report as written is fine with me.
Jim hayes
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 5:57 AM Ankry <ankry.wiki(a)onet.pl> wrote:
I think that information like "WCUG member X
presented a session on Y at
event Z" would be hard to manage in this form as (1) we have no formally
managed membership at the moment (maybe we should change this and ask
interested people for formal declarations at regular intervals? - the list
on meta is unmaintained and contains initial declarations only) and (2)
most of us are also members of other formal affiliates and while our
activity in specific fields can be separated internally, this separation
would be not verifiable without clear declarations of these members (should
we ask them for such declarations concerning any Wikisource related
activity?)
For example, while I am a member of WMPL and participated in the
organization committee of Źródłosłów 2021, I clearly declared to WMPL that
I represent the community, not WMPL during the organizational process. But
neither information about roles of the conference organizing committee
members, nor this declaration is anywhere in public. Only the results of
this activity are public.
And I am active in WMPL in non-Wikisource related fields and also in some
Wikisource-related fields.
Ankry
W dniu 13.11.2021 o 20:12, Asaf Bartov pisze:
Thank you for starting the report, Ankry!
I think it should be clear what the user group is claiming as an
activity. For instance, was the usergroup involved in the creation of the
Balinese and Javanese Wikisource projects, mentioned under "Milestones"?
If so, the report should explain how the group was involved; if it is just
a mention of a milestone for Wikisource (as distinct from a milestone for
the Wikisource Community User Group), it should be clearly separated from
the main section of the report, which should be devoted to activities and
communications of the WCUG.
Likewise, was the user group involved in planning or organizing the
events mentioned? If so, it should be stated explicitly. (And if the
involvement was only that a member of the user group presented at the
event, then *that* should be stated explicitly (e.g. "WCUG member X
presented a session on Y at event Z"), avoiding the impression the event
itself is [co-]organized by the user group.)
Cheers,
A.
Asaf Bartov (he/him/his)
Senior Program Officer, Emerging Wikimedia Communities
Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/>
Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the
sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality!
https://donate.wikimedia.org
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 7:11 PM Satdeep Gill <satdeepgill(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Here is the link to the report:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikisource_Community_User_Group/2021_Report
Best
Satdeep
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021, 7:57 PM Ankry <ankry.wiki(a)onet.pl> wrote:
Hi everyone,
As we are close to the end of this year, I started preparing the 2021
WCUG annual report. Formally, it is due end of November.
If anyone participated or organized some Wikisource events, please add
appropriate sections.
Cheers,
Ankry
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list -- wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikisource-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list -- wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikisource-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list -- wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikisource-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list -- wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikisource-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list -- wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe send an email to wikisource-l-leave(a)lists.wikimedia.org