On 5/3/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">-jkb-</b> &lt;-<a href="mailto:jkb-@web.de">jkb-@web.de</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I agree that Wikisource is not a place for this in general. If there will be<br>a code with some historical interest etc., so then we have an exception and<br>the yes, it could stay. But otherwise it would be probably better to have
<br>such codes elsewhere, e.g. on Wikibooks.<br>-jkb-</blockquote><div><br>Actually, WP and WB have many examples of source code.&nbsp; Browsing their pages, they've got entire lists of certain programs (e.g. Hello world) written in over 20 different programming languages (exactly like the source code pages WS has).&nbsp; Really, our content is redundant with theirs, and there really should be no problem in removing all those items from our database.
<br><br>Z<br></div></div>