Thanks for the info.Yeah, it would be good to analyze the data and see what worked and what not.How's going in the English contest?AubreyOn Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Carles Paredes Lanau <carlesparedes@gmail.com> wrote:
Catalan Wikipedia has a link to contest too. The reason of Italian success is that only count validated pages. In Catalan contest the most contributions proofreads pages (75%), because it's three points and validates 1 point. Although the activity is awesome too.
Next week, we should analyze this contest for future editions.
El dia 27/11/2013 9.16, "Andrea Zanni" <zanni.andrea84@gmail.com> va escriure:_______________________________________________Dear Wikisourcerors,English, Catalan and Italian Wikisource are running a proofreading contest.Looking at the stats (http://toolserver.org/~phe/statistics.php?diff=1)we see that the Italian Wikisource is way more succesfull: this is probably due to the fact that we have a link to the contest on the Italian Wikipedia.I would suggest you to ask the community to run it for you for the last days,it could be a boost for the contest.And, hopefully, some users will stay :-)AubreyPS: I also think that the "lottery" prize, which we copied from the Catalan contest, is a great idea. In the Italian contest, the second and third prize will be extracted from the validated pages: this means that everyone has a chance to win, and the more I read the more chance I have.
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l