Agreed with Ray here, the watermarking and "licencing agreement" for stuff that's public domain is a bit of a turnoff.  Otherwise, it would be great to cross-reference what Wikisource has and what this site has, find out what he has that we don't, and take steps to correct that ;-)

Cheers,
Craig

On 3 December 2011 09:58, Ray Saintonge <saintonge@telus.net> wrote:
This is an interesting and useful site, but prohibiting the electronic
reproduction of the content, even as it applies to material that is
indisputably in the public domain is not on the spirit of open software.

Ray

On 12/01/11 5:15 PM, Erik Moeller wrote:
> Ron Unz, a long-time Wikimedia supporter, alerted me to this personal
> project that he's been working on for a long time:
>
> http://www.unz.org/
>
> It's an archive of periodicals, books, and videos, some of which
> hosted there, some externally.
>
> Examples:
>
> http://www.unz.org/Publication/SaturdayRev
> http://www.unz.org/Publication/Century
>
> Timeslice from the outbreak of WWI:
>
> http://www.unz.org/Publication/AllArticles?Period=1914aug
>
> According to Ron, the system contains almost 400,000 authors and their
> writings. A couple of examples of author pages:
>
> http://www.unz.org/Author/MenckenHL
> http://www.unz.org/Author/WhartonEdith
>
> Ron believes that the copyright situation is clear -- that either it's
> PD due to age, due to lack of copyright renewal, or that he has
> permission in some cases via licensing agreements. In any case,
> there's quite a bit of unambiguously public domain stuff there that I
> haven't seen digitized elsewhere, and it should be useful as a
> research library for Wikipedians as well.
>
> Cheers,
> Erik
>


_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l