daniwo59(a)aol.com wrote:
Hello
I am reading an amazing article on Wikisource, [[Alcibiades]]. It is well
written and likely to be a featured article soon. My only contention is this
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcibiades#Primary_sources_
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcibiades#Primary_sources)
I wonder how many of those can be Wikisource sources.
I don't see why there should be any limitation on using material on
Wikisource. The Wikisource material is not normally original, so citing
it should be viewed as equivalent to citing a hard copy of the book.
Ec