The Individual Engagement Grant that me and David did was simply aimed to gather the community and try to do things together, spread the good ideas, join scattered individuals and communities.
We had some results, that the WMF could take and build upon (think about the survey).
I'm getting a little tired, every year at Wikimania, to hear the same praise of Wikisource by WMF Board or Staff but being told that we are "supported" but not in the "priority list".
I would think that there are some many low hanging fruits that donors money would be well spent (ie. the Wikisource contest that is running now on several Wikisources. In Italy, the chapter gave 100 euros for the prizes, and we gained 4300 proofread pages in a single week (it takes 6 months for the community to get those numbers)).
I'm sorry if I sound like a broken record, but it's my perception that a minimal effort from the WMF could lead to major results. I still don't understand why they do not think about that.
Aubrey
PS: I think about the WMF because for chapters is more difficult to step in and work on core software related matters. Chapters can and do work on GLAM partnerships, liasons, collaboration, digitization plans. "Local" stuff. At least, that is my perception (also, as a chapter president).