Hoi,
A Wikipedia matra is be bold and another is that things are a work in
progress. In my opinion, what we need is the name of a book, its author and
the fact that people can read it. All the other stuff like what "version"
is a particular book pales in comparison. We should not let the quest for
perfection be the enemy of the good.
Also
Archive.org and Open Library are two different entities. Both the Open
Library and the Internet Archive have their own identifiers for authors and
they are not necessarily linked. We are talking about books from the Open
Library and they are available as an E-book or a PDF.
My problem is not with Open Library, my problem is that we do not know what
is available from Wikisource as a finished good ready for reading. In the
end what we advertise is the author the book, versions are secondary.
Thanks,
GerardM
On 23 October 2017 at 12:36, billinghurst <billinghurstwiki(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Nicolas,
Still my biggest issues/hurdles for good data are
- capture of information from WS to WD — it just is hard work, WEF
tool is still not sufficiently aligned
- the ever problematic inability to link WP book to WS edition through
Wikidata
- that cannot capture information for Wikidata at
archive.org, and
relate that through to the file at Commons, and then the edition at
Wikisource (or pick another starting point and interrelate0
- the inability to create an edition from a book/work, the inability
to create a work from an edition
Maybe you can even ask what we need to improve to get bots to run through
and autocapture, is our meta-data in headers not suitable? What is it that
is problematic?
Thanks for asking.
-- billinghurst (being so remote for the action <sigh>)
------ Original Message ------
From: "Nicolas VIGNERON" <vigneron.nicolas(a)gmail.com>
To: "discussion list for Wikisource, the free library" <
wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Sent: 23/10/2017 7:30:44 PM
Subject: [Wikisource-l] WikidataCon 2017
Hi all,
For information, the WikidataCon is this week-end in Berlin. While there
is no talk nominatively around Wikisource, there is some intervention on
relation subjects (inventaire.io, WikiCite, German National Library,
FRBR, and so on).
The event is sold out, but you can follow remotely some of the
presentation (link will be added here :
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/
Wikidata:WikidataCon_2017/Program/Remote ).
I'll be there and I'll be happy to talk about Wikisource, who else will be
there?
Cdlt, ~nicolas
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l