Amir, 

Coming from a community with not much volunteer force, I actually want any strategy which involves minimal human interference into the tagging process, as we can't afford to spread our thin line.  

Your first option looks more inclined to what I was trying to say. However, I understand that there will be possibilities of errors or ambiguities and need some level of human check system anyway.

Personally, I would love the third option but looks like it requires more engineering than the other two, forgive me if I am wrong. So considering the lack of initiatives in this area in the past, I would stick to the first one as a more practical approach for now.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa


On Wed, Jul 29, 2020, 02:18 Amir E. Aharoni <amir.aharoni@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote:
Do you mean that templates (or some other annotation syntax) will be added to wikitext, just not by humans?

Or suggested by software, and added to wikitext after being confirmed by humans?

Or not added to wikitext at all and stored separately somewhere?

בתאריך יום ג׳, 28 ביולי 2020, 18:36, מאת Bodhisattwa Mandal ‏<bodhisattwa.rgkmc@gmail.com>:
Hello,

I would like to know if any Wikisource community has moved forward to automatically[1] tag or annotate Wikisource texts or has any plans to do so.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa

[1] (without manually adding annotation templates)
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l
_______________________________________________
Wikisource-l mailing list
Wikisource-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikisource-l