Cbrown1023 wrote:
Cbrown1023 of the English Wikiquote has requested that
fellow
administrator, Poetlister, be removed as a sysop citing reasons
such as being a staff member of Wikipedia Review
(
http://wikipediareview.com/) and being blocked on the English
Wikipedia as a sockpuppet
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AN#Runcorn_and_sockpuppets_banned).
Just to be clear, no formal request for desysopping Poetlister on
Wikiquote has been filed yet at [[q:en:WQ:RFA#Requests for de-adminship]].
The overall discussion about [[q:en:User:Poetlister]], where desysopping
(among other things) is being considered, is taking place on the village
pump (see the link below).
Cbrown1023 also wrote:
The issue in itself is quite complicated, but
Poetlister's trust has
been put into question and after discussion, she may face a vote on
whether or not she may keep her sysop status. Due to the fact that
many users on the English Wikiquote may have a conflict of interest
and we need more opinions to be fair, I request that any and all
user who read this put forth their opinion at the English
Wikiquote's Village pump.
(
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Wikiquote:Village_pump#Poetlister)
I'm not clear on what the "conflict of interest" mentioned is here. If it
is because all participating Wikiquote editors (mostly sysops) supported
Poetlister in her RfA (with none opposing, which is fairly common on
en:WQ) and/or that the current WQ sysops have worked successfully with her
thus far, I would also be concerned about the potential conflict of
interest of any *Wikipedian* who has worked with WP's Poetlister,
especially those who avidly supported her or have participated in
sysopping, desysopping, or blocking actions against her. If there are
other apparent conflicts of interest, Cbrown1023, please make them
explicit. Thank you.