No, something is not right there. Reviewed does not override sighted,
but sighted is the default view. The definition of sighted is: "This
version does not contain vandalism". In particular, most of your
points are given in the german proposal:
2007/4/25, R. S. Shaw <shaww(a)inbox.com>om>:
"Unvandalized" might be special in these
(1) One can set it without setting any other dimension.
In the german proposal, flags have no dimension and I agree, a
dimension for unvandalized is strange.
(2) If set and no other rating is set, the
"unvandalized" icon is displayed.
Yes, the reader has to be given a clear notice, that this version to
all humanly possible does not contain "Motherfucker".
(3) Perhaps, the right to set "Unvandalized"
can be granted separately from other review rights.
In the german proposal, this is naturally given.
(4) Perhaps, a non-null setting in any other dimension
requires or implies that "Unvandalized" is set.
This is technically not the case in the proposal, but any reviewer who
would give a vandalized version the review flag would be in serious
And you are right, I think that this is the sensible way to treat the