Code review is behind (I have checkuser/rev_deleted stuff waiting to be committed), but as of MW 1.12, logs *should* show in watchlists.

-Aaron Schulz

> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:36:35 -0800
> From: shaww@inbox.com
> To: wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Visibility of Flagging
>
> P. Birken wrote:
> > ... However, I think some more visibility of this stuff would
> > be useful. A nice compromise could be to include all flaggings and
> > removal of flags of higher level than sighted into the history and the
> > recent changes. What do you think?
> >
>
> It seems to me this is not really needed. Normally this case would happen when a reviewer is correcting himself, as after he accidentally put Quality on the wrong revision. It's appropriate that the revision history simply show the current thinking on the state of the revision (which it does).
>
> If the lowering/removal of the Quality rating is due to a conflicting assessment by a different reviewer, then it should be noted or discussed on the talk page. The change information is available in the log, and needn't also be in the history. (It does add clutter to the history, and is inconsistent.)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikiquality-l mailing list
> Wikiquality-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l

---

Climb to the top of the charts!  Play Star Shuffle:  the word scramble challenge with star power. Play Now!