Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 18:45:03 +0200
From: erik(a)wikimedia.org
To: wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Reverts
The previous behavior was even more broken. We should only show the
"current and sighted" message if both the page _and_ all templates are
sighted.
On 10/6/07, Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4587(a)msn.com> wrote:
No, it looks fine to me:
http://wikixp.org/qa/index.php5?title=Berlin&stable=1
That is the stable version. The old static version are here
http://wikixp.org/qa/index.php5?title=Special:Stableversions&page=Berlin
. They are fine too.
The UI saying "current & sighted" is misleading. Erik changed it to do
that
if the current rev ID = latest stable rev ID. I avoided that because images
and templates might differ. For logged in users, they see the current
revision. But if it the ID = last stable ID, the message shows like "current
& reviewed" whatever, which is misleading. I'm tempted to revert the
changes. Another issue is that someone locally turned off the "stable" tab.
-Aaron Schulz
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:07:22 +0200
From: pbirken(a)gmail.com
To: wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Reverts
I tested this in
http://wikixp.org/qa/index.php5/Berlin:
the old
version
http://wikixp.org/qa/index.php5?title=Berlin&oldid=190 was
created when the template was not vandalized,
still the current,
vandalized template is shown.
Bye,
Philipp
2007/10/5, Aaron Schulz <jschulz_4587(a)msn.com>om>:
>
> The expanded text at the time is stored, with tables listing the
> corresponding template/image version used when parsed. It is still the
> same...
>
> -Aaron Schulz
>
> > Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:05:24 +0100
> > From: dgerard(a)gmail.com
> > To: wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > Subject: Re: [Wikiquality-l] Reverts
>
> >
> > On 05/10/2007, P. Birken <pbirken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that templates are not stored with a stable version
anymore?
> > > Is that correct, Aaron?
> >
> >
> > Um, that would be really bad, and is a really glaring avenue for
> vandalism.
> >
> >
> > - d.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikiquality-l mailing list
> > Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> >
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
>
> ________________________________
> Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble
> challenge with star power. Play Now!
> _______________________________________________
> Wikiquality-l mailing list
> Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
________________________________
Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble
challenge with star power. Play Now!
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikiquality-l
--
Toward Peace, Love & Progress:
Erik
DISCLAIMER: This message does not represent an official position of
the Wikimedia Foundation or its Board of Trustees.
_______________________________________________
Wikiquality-l mailing list
Wikiquality-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org