P. Birken wrote:
... However, I think some more visibility of this
stuff would
be useful. A nice compromise could be to include all flaggings and
removal of flags of higher level than sighted into the history and the
recent changes. What do you think?
It seems to me this is not really needed. Normally this case would happen when a reviewer
is correcting himself, as after he accidentally put Quality on the wrong revision.
It's appropriate that the revision history simply show the current thinking on the
state of the revision (which it does).
If the lowering/removal of the Quality rating is due to a conflicting assessment by a
different reviewer, then it should be noted or discussed on the talk page. The change
information is available in the log, and needn't also be in the history. (It does add
clutter to the history, and is inconsistent.)