> priority levels to the features that are not yet
done. Based on this,
> Jörg will decide what to do next. Priority 1 is the highest.
Just to give credit where credit is due - most of the code is currently
submitted by Aaron, who does an excellent and fast job, if you ask me.
So this is not about me deciding, but us having an idea on how to
tagging: should this tag be implicitly set by any user
within the associated group when editing? (this will be used for the
###Todo: do it
I think that's pretty important to have; if want vandalism review
(which is going to have the biggest PR impact) to be scalable, we need
to be able to flag lots of changes by trusted users automatically as
Mmmh, I take it that people will discuss this and Philipp will change
the priority according to the outcome of the discussion ;-)