Richard Grevers wrote:
On 18 Aug 2003 23:15:00 +0200, Till Westermayer
<till(a)tillwe.de> gave
utterance to the following:
I'd say there is a difference between the
local level ("Canterbury
Regional Council", "Indian electoral districts", "Orange County
School
Board") and the sub-national state level ("England", "States of
India",
"California"). These difference is especially visible in the
significance to the rest of the world.
Well even the smaller states of India are more populous than most US
states.
I think that there is a "market" for some of this oddball information.
Excuse my ignorance of the US electoral system, but
are there
gubnertorial contests happening in some or all of the other states at
the same time? If there are, then why should California be singled
out, other than for the reason that California tends to be self
aggrandizing? And the reason for that might be that it is home to the
third-largest film and TV industry in the world and the accompanying
media circus?
The media circus only adds flavour of the event. Each US state has its
own rules to determine the length of term of office for state officials,
often even with some logic to the matter. The current events in
California are irregular in that it first involves an attempt to recall
the current governor, Gray Davis, from office in the middle of his term.
This way the California process won't be upstaged by any similar events
in other states. (I'm sorry but the states of India with the same
reverance in the mind of the average American, even if there are more
West Bengalis than Californians.)
Californians will receive two ballots on October 7. In the first they
will be asked if Gray Davis is to keep his job; that matter can be
decided by a simple majority of votes cast. If he does keep his job the
second vote will be moot. The real fun begins in the very likely
possibility that Californians shoose to give him the boot. The winner
will be the top vote getter in a list of 135 candidates who have bought
lottery tickets. In theory the winner could be governor with the
support of less than 1% of the voters... which then means very much less
than 1% of Californians.
The laughter is being shared by citizens of the other states equally
with those of other countries, and perhaps wryly even with some
good-humoured Californians.
Ec