The Cunctator wrote:
Well, if people aren't allowed to edit the pages
without review from the
mailing list--and pretty much everyone who's on the mailing list can
have (or should have, IMHO) sysop priveleges, then the pages are in
effect locked down. And if they're in effect locked down, then they
should be locked down. Otherwise there's a logical disconnect.
When I said "lock down" I meant "prevent unauthorized edits". It
doesn't
matter if that prevention is done through technology or practice--it all
amounts to the same thing.
Locked down against whom? Where's the fire? Aside from vandals, you're the only
person I can think of who has changed them to read something which is not policy.
kq