Alfio Puglisi wrote:
To make #2 work, you need to have two separate deletion
tools: one for
legally-required deletion, and one for generic deletion.
Alfio
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Mark Williamson wrote:
Hoi,
Given the amount of work that is in need of doing, I think it is a waste
of time to discuss it further. When something needs deleling and it is,
creating a backdoor to see it anyway is for normal use not necessary.
Creating two methods violates the KISS principle.
Thanks,
GerardM
>Please reread #2.
>
>
>On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:48:06 +0800, Andrew Lih <andrew.lih(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:02:22 -0700, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>>
>>>1) Since this is a technical issue (isn't it?) shouldn't it have been
>>>put up for a vote on meta rather than en:?
>>>
>>>
>>Not really a technical issue. The most prominent of the "no" votes
>>cited legal issues. Anthere put it best:
>>
>>"Many of the articles deleted are deleted for a very good reason. Some
>>because they are copyright violations or libel. These must stay non
>>visible for obvious legal reasons."
>>
>>-Andrew (User:Fuzheado)
>>