Yann Forget yann@forget-me.net said:
We had one such issue on fr: recently about [[Action directe (...)]].
Some wanted to say "(terrorist group)", some "(left-extremist group)", and some other "(armed group)" and the last "(revolutionary group)". And any other combinations of the above.
The issue is not settled yet.
What about the very neutral "(group)"? Is it pretty much consensus that they are a group? Is there another group named "Action directe" that needs to be disambiguated from?
~ESP
Evan Prodromou wrote:
Yann Forget yann@forget-me.net said:
We had one such issue on fr: recently about [[Action directe (...)]].
Some wanted to say "(terrorist group)", some "(left-extremist
group)", and
some other "(armed group)" and the last "(revolutionary group)". And any other combinations of the above.
The issue is not settled yet.
What about the very neutral "(group)"? Is it pretty much consensus that they are a group? Is there another group named "Action directe" that needs to be disambiguated from?
~ESP
Group sounds somehow unnatural.
As far as consensus goes, I might say that there should be pretty much a consensus that they are an armed group. I doubt anyone would dispute they use weapons to help their voice be heard.
Any other reference (left-extremist or terrorist) is a POV rather than a factual description so should be left aside
Le Saturday 31 July 2004 16:48, Anthere a écrit :
We had one such issue on fr: recently about [[Action directe (...)]]. Some wanted to say "(terrorist group)", some "(left-extremist
group)", and
some other "(armed group)" and the last "(revolutionary group)". And any other combinations of the above.
The issue is not settled yet.
What about the very neutral "(group)"? Is it pretty much consensus that they are a group? Is there another group named "Action directe" that needs to be disambiguated from?
~ESP
Group sounds somehow unnatural.
As far as consensus goes, I might say that there should be pretty much a consensus that they are an armed group. I doubt anyone would dispute they use weapons to help their voice be heard.
Any other reference (left-extremist or terrorist) is a POV rather than a factual description so should be left aside
Yes, I would agree with that. For the time being, it settled to http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Action_directe_(groupe_arm%C3%A9)
Yann
Evan Prodromou wrote:
Yann Forget yann@forget-me.net said:
We had one such issue on fr: recently about [[Action directe (...)]].
Some wanted to say "(terrorist group)", some "(left-extremist
group)", and
some other "(armed group)" and the last "(revolutionary group)". And any other combinations of the above.
The issue is not settled yet.
What about the very neutral "(group)"? Is it pretty much consensus that they are a group? Is there another group named "Action directe" that needs to be disambiguated from?
"Militant" is always available. :-)
Ec
wikipedia-l@lists.wikimedia.org