J.L.W.S. The Special One wrote: > My sentiments exactly. > > 2007/9/22, Ian Tresman <ian2(a)knowledge.co.uk>uk>: >> At 23:09 21/09/2007, Dan Bolser wrote: >>>> There's a big fuzzy >>>> middle where we need to begin by assuming that the person posting

>>>> information is acting in good faith, and often approaching the

Where would that leave articles like "Joe Black is Eric Black's youngest brother." ?

My sentiments exactly. 2007/9/22, Ian Tresman <ian2(a)knowledge.co.uk>uk>: > At 23:09 21/09/2007, Dan Bolser wrote: > >>> There's a big fuzzy >>> middle where we need to begin by assuming that the person posting the >>> information is acting in good faith, and often approaching the content >>> from a different perspecive. This won't save all the questioned >>> articles, but it may bring peace. perhaps we should begin treating >>> simple "nn" deletion requests as a breach of good faith. >>> >> That would be nice. I think this is the correct attitude. >> > I think people who don't want an article will still claim it is > non-notable... even though editors are acting in good faith, from a > different perspective, or whatever

Perhaps a person proposing a deletion should answer a series of questions that show what he has done to check the meaningfulness of the article.