2007/5/7, Walter van Kalken <walter(a)vankalken.net>et>:
Within 2 hours I was mobbed by 3 users, with whom I
have had conflicts
previously and who stalk me on talkpages, who feel that the appearance
of an article is more important than what is in it. I have a number of
fans on nl.wikipedia who take turns in following me everywhere, or do
groupattacks. This is why I decided to stop contributing knowledge in
october last year as it was of no use. These people are in no way
interested in the subjects I write about, but are more interested in
attacking and harassing me and stopping me from contributing. Sadly
enough I can only edit if I edit under another name. I have been
requested multiple times by users on IRC to start editing under another
wikinick. It is said that this has to be.
What Waerth does not tell you is that the "attacking and harassing"
consisted of nothing more than removing some very non-standard layout
that Waerth had put on the article. Wikipedia is a community project,
and Waerth should not be surprised if the articles he writes are
adapted so that they are more similar in style to the rest of
Wikipedia.
After this I was and still am so sickened by the way
wikipedia and ALL
wikimedia projects have become that I decided to stop editting on April
10th.
Well, you had stopped editing before as well. And if this is sickening
you, then I am not surprised that you are sickened very often on
Wikipedia.
Today I got an email from someone telling me I am now
blocked for a
month! It seemed that while I was away a procedure against me was started.
I was not heard on anything, nor was I asked to give my view of anything
that had happened! If you try someone someone gets a chance to defend
themselves don't they?
Well, protest if you want. But above you yourself admit that you used
proxies to edit while you were blocked. That's what you were blocked
for, so I don't see how you would have successfully defended yourself
against that.
--
Andre Engels, andreengels(a)gmail.com
ICQ: 6260644 -- Skype: a_engels