http://www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/evidhiv.htm
The number of peer reviewed academic studies cited here is
substantial. And the conclusions reached by careful scientific
analysis appears to be overwhelming.
"In a Canadian cohort, investigators followed 715 homosexual men for a
median of 8.6 years. Every case of AIDS in this cohort occurred in
individuals who were HIV-seropositive. No AIDS-defining illnesses
occurred in men who remained negative for HIV antibodies, despite the
fact that these individuals had appreciable patterns of illicit drug
use and receptive anal intercourse (Schechter et al. Lancet
1993;341:658)."
I urge everyone to read this page very very carefully before
commenting casually on this issue. Harry, I especially invite you to
read it and see if it changes your opinion that people are "censoring"
you.
--Jimbo
harry wrote:
Stirling Newberry states:
There is now a
mountain of evidence that HIV is the necessary, though not always
sufficient, cause of AIDS.
Again, the standard for "truth" in science is to publish research in
scholarly scientific journal with peer review. Part of the peer review
process is to establish whether the research results have been
replicated by others. After all isn't that what we are after here - the
"truth". Here are picture of the viruses that cause Polio, the Common
Cold, and Herpes,
http://www.usablemakeover.com/virus_pictures.html
So Stirling please cite one study published in a scholarly scientific
journal with peer review that states "HIV Is The Probable Cause of
AIDS". Is it cited on Wikipedia for me to read? If not where can I find
it? At the same time give me one reference to a electron microscopic
picture of HIV.
- Harry Pasternak
--
"La nèfle est un fruit." - first words of 50,000th article on
fr.wikipedia.org