...anyhow I would like to add that wanting to avoid possible legal
problems is indeed a motivator in many situations; also that in most
cases where there is a translated form of the name Wikipedia, that
translation is not trademarked (for example, the Armenian name).
Also, I don't know if you realise this but Wikipedia is really a very
generic name and I don't think we should be allowed to hog it as we
do.
A cheeseburger is a hamburger with cheese. A Wikipedia is an
encyclopaedia using wikiwiki software... well not really, it only
means a specific one (!). That just doesn't make sense - Wikipedia is
a very generic name.
Mark
On 09/06/05, Mark Williamson <node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No, there is no objection, and I don't think there
ever has been.
The same seems to be true with Amis, except that Amis doesn't have a
suitable language code.
If it would be OK, an agreement was reached among the involved parties
that
amis.wiktionary.org would be suitable. (they wanted a Wiktionary
created, and maybe a Wikipedia at some future date).
Otherwise, xxx-amis, i-amis, x-amis, or anything like that might be OK.
Amis will actually have a code in the new version of the ISO
three-letter codes, but it hasn't been finalised yet (I for one think
it's horrible -- it's based almost entirely on the Ethnologue, which
means they combine languages which shouldn't be combined and divide
languages which shouldn't be divided, and exclude some languages
altogether).
There haven't been any objections to the Sa--whatsit Wikipedia, but
then there are no good code suggestions either.
Also, a Scots Wikipedia (among others) has been requested and has a
test Wikipedia that seems to be working a bit. I don't recall any
objections to Scots either, and it has an iso code, sco:
Mark
On 08/06/05, Angela <beesley(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 09/06/05, Mark Williamson
<node.ue(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Os.wikipedia was requested around the same time
as the Võro kiil`
Wikipedia, but it was created sooner. One possible reason is that they
had an off-site Ossetic version of Wikipedia that they set up, which
might've helped increase the apparent urgency for a developer (the
sooner you set it up, the less likely they are to remain at a separate
website, etc).
Since Võro is already being edited as part of the Test-wp on meta, I
don't think a separate site would help here.
I don't know if it's exactly legal to use
the name "wikipedia" for an
off-site version, in fact I'm betting it's not, but the foundation has
plenty of more important things to worry about than costly legal
battles over whether or not such sites should be able to use the name,
especially if it's only temporary.
Please don't do this. Violating the Foundation's trademarks is hardly
a good start to getting your wiki accepted within the project. If it
needs to be off-site, you should choose another name for it until it
is officially a Wikipedia.
Is there actually any objection to Võro being created now at fiu-vro?
Angela.
_______________________________________________
Wikipedia-l mailing list
Wikipedia-l(a)Wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
--
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE
--
SI HOC LEGERE SCIS NIMIVM ERVDITIONIS HABES
QVANTVM MATERIAE MATERIETVR MARMOTA MONAX SI MARMOTA MONAX MATERIAM
POSSIT MATERIARI
ESTNE VOLVMEN IN TOGA AN SOLVM TIBI LIBET ME VIDERE