If the quality of the articles there is questionable, then so is the quality of ro.wiki articles because 99% of ours are copied from you.
Mark
On 05/12/05, Wikipedia Romania (Ronline) rowikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
How about having two DB tables, splitting the domain, like Chinese Wikipedia does (Simplified and Traditional)? _______________________________________________
I think that's unnecessary. The Moldovan language case is a unique one throughout the world in that Moldovan is a politically-renamed Romanian spoken in Moldovan. It would be just like the Austrian government declares today that the language spoken officially in Austria is called "Austrian". Therefore, we don't need a separate Wikipedia for Moldovan in Latin script
- Romanian can already cater for that. In fact, we have users from Moldova
reading and contributing to our content at ro.wiki.
For that reason, I think mo.wiki could be abolished entirely. If people really want a Cyrillic version, then it should be moved to mo-cyr, and mo should act as a portal, with one link to ro.wiki, one link to mo-cyr. But currently, the demand for Cyrillic is almost inexistent, and the quality of the articles there is very questionable.
Ronline _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l
-- "Take away their language, destroy their souls." -- Joseph Stalin