Larry Sanger wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, tarquin wrote:
I suggest that such a safe haven be non-editable: a presentation of the best of Wikipedia, not a forking.
It is disingenuous to call the proposal of expert guidance of a revived Nupedia a "fork." But, if due to your hostility to the idea you want to call it one, that's your prerogative.
Having two versions of one article, both editable, is a fork by definition -- just as Karl Juhnge says.
Will this whole "Cream of Wikipedia" idea actually attract the experts we feel we need?