I don't mind top posting (did this conversation not happen recently?) so long as people do not alternate between top and bottom posting in a single thread so that you have no idea who said what then. Its like the use of British and American English in article. Whoever got there first (top poster or bottom poster) should have their convention respected.
Dalf
Mark Williamson wrote:
What's wrong with top-posting? I absolutely love it!
On 27/07/06, Ole Andersen palnatoke@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/07/06, mboverload mboverload@gmail.com wrote:
Why are you signing as Jimbo?
He didn't. He top-posted, which is worse. So did you, btw.
-Palnatoke
-- http://palnatoke.org * Ole Andersen, Copenhagen, DK
h:+45 61 91 48 88 w: +45 35 45 44 29 _______________________________________________ Wikipedia-l mailing list Wikipedia-l@Wikimedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikipedia-l